by Bishop Broderick Pabillo, DD
The sacrifice of Our Lord Jesus and its impact on religious life today
by Bishop Broderick Pabillo, DD
Bishop Jose Colin Bagaforo said the prevailing human rights situation has compelled his office to initiate and spearhead a dialogue
LiCAS News
Mark Saludes | March 30, 2021
Caritas Philippines, the social action arm of the Catholic Church, said it will sit down with the military to discuss the country’s human rights situation, including the red-tagging of activists.
Bishop Jose Colin Bagaforo, national director of Caritas Philippines, said the prevailing human rights situation has compelled his office to “initiate and spearhead a dialogue.”
The prelate has expressed alarm over the government’s counterinsurgency and anti-terrorism campaigns that have “no distinction between a combatant and a non-combatant.”
“[Caritas Philippines] is calling for a meaningful dialogue that will put an end to the bloodshed, vilification, and attacks on human life and rights,” said Bishop Bagaforo.
He noted that people “are being vilified, red-tagged, harassed, intimidated, subjected to illegal surveillance, jailed, and even killed.”
In a statement, Caritas Philippines noted that organizations and individuals “are accused of being communists or terrorists because of their political and ideological beliefs.”
“It is more alarming that priests, nuns, lay missionaries, and several faith-based organizations are vilified and red-tagged because of their prophetic mandate to serve the people,” read the statement.
Rights group Karapatan has recorded at least 396 political killings from July 2016, when President Rodrigo Duterte came to power, to December 2020.
Philippine authorities have accused some Church-based organizations of supporting communist rebels.
Early this month, the Anti-Money Laundering Council ordered the suspension of the bank accounts and assets of the United Church of Christ in the Philippines’ HARAN Center in Davao City.
The center has been providing sanctuary for at least 400 displaced indigenous peoples. Last year, the bank accounts of the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines have also been suspended. Both church groups have been tagged as “above-ground communist organizations.”
“For decades now, UCCP-Haran Center has been a known sanctuary for Lumad people in Southern Mindanao, whose communities have repeatedly been terrorized by the Philippine Army and paramilitary groups. The UCCP Haran is simply performing their calling to ‘participate in the establishment of a just and compassionate social order.”
By ANNE MARXZE D. UMIL
Bulatlat.com
MANILA – An indigenous peoples’ group assailed the freezing of accounts of the United Church of Christ in the Philippines (UCCP) – Haran Center in Davao del Sur.
The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC), in a resolution dated March 12, ordered the freezing of UCCP Haran’s three bank accounts and a real property under the name of Brokenshire Integrated Health Ministries, Inc. The AMLC allegedly found that “the assets are used to finance terrorism” which is in violation of the Republic Act 10168 or Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act.
Sandugo – Movement of Moro and Indigenous Peoples for Self-Determination condemned the action, saying it is ironic that amid massive corruption and the non-disclosure of President Duterte’s statement of assets, liabilities and networth, human rights advocates are the ones whose accounts are being investigated.
“For decades now, UCCP-Haran Center has been a known sanctuary for Lumad people in Southern Mindanao, whose communities have repeatedly been terrorized by the Philippine Army and paramilitary groups. The UCCP Haran is simply performing their calling to ‘participate in the establishment of a just and compassionate social order,’” the group said in a statement.
They added that the UCCP compound in Haran also served as shelter for the displaced Lumad due to intense militarization of their communities.
“That is not a crime. It is an act of faith and kindness,” the group said.
Continue readingPhilippine Daily Inquirer | March 29, 2021
OPINION
Bishop Broderick Pabillo deserves praise not just from Catholics, but from all Filipinos. He has contributed a valuable element lacking in today’s national governance — a reasonable approach to solving crises. The bishop’s indignant and firm riposte at the latest move of the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases comes from a critical and creative mind that seeks the spiritual good of his flock. His approach can be useful in pursuing not merely the spiritual aspect, but also the other facets surrounding this present crisis.
The good bishop has pointed out the flaws of the system now in use in proposing solutions and tactics. He was right in demanding clarity of concepts and strategies. How do you define “mass gatherings” in the first place, for example? Is a worship service, kept to the minimum of participants and adhering to health protocols, necessarily an illegal mass gathering? He was also correct in insisting that actions, before being imposed, should go through open, enlightened, and participative consultations. Decisions from above that do not take into account the actual situations and do not involve the people who will be affected are oppressive, if not unrealistic, prejudiced, and ineffective.
It was clear that the bishop was unfazed by the negative reactions of regime supporters and even of bullying threats from a spokesman who should be reminded that he is a mere mouthpiece and not a decision-maker. What mattered most to Bishop Pabillo was doing his responsibility as a cleric and as a citizen. His pastoral statement consisted neither of vitriol nor empty rhetoric, if you return to the text itself. Nowhere did he call for defiance, since he himself vigorously enforces to this day the protocols in the churches under his care. He, however, did challenge the concerned officials to think and act rightly this time, and hopefully in the future. Surprisingly, they responded to his challenge positively.
The Church, imperfect and far from spotless, nevertheless has 500 years of direct encounter and experience in helping the sick and the dying, the hungry and the homeless, the depressed and the unemployed, and it has done more than its responsible share during this pandemic. It has also not failed to add its voice to the clamor for the rights of marginalized, indigenous, targeted, and tagged individuals and groups. In an atmosphere that tries to quell the opinions, suggestions, and questions of people, and that tries to dismiss dissenters as nonpartners in dialogue, the bishop’s voice and directive to his church come as a source of light and hope. Bishop Pabillo not only spoke out; he first provoked his own people to be seriously decisive, participative, and reasonable. Those in power who heard his voice learned a valuable lesson, too.
JONATHAN DANIELS
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Mga layunin ng pamphlet:
The Problematique:
This is a difficult topic to deal with: Activism in the Christian Prophetic Tradition. It invites fear: the war against drugs and the war against communist terrorists have created the same patterns of victimization: the “tokhang” against the poor suspected of involvement in the drug trade and the activists involved in the work for social change, on behalf of justice, peace, human rights and integrity of creation. “Tokhang” is carried out, first by identifying them publicly either as drug peddlers or red-tagged activists, then the procurement of search warrants, the raids in the middle of the night, followed by arrests, disappearances and the kill or the massacre, with impunity! It provokes anger: why should the “tokhang” be directed at activists who are helping construct a better world of justice and peace? More profoundly, it challenges the deepest, most complex contradicting resources of our being: faith and faithlessness, hope and hopelessness, love and lovelessness, compassion and despair, hatred and indifference, humanity and animality, fanaticism and meaninglessness, life and death, justice and violence, action and paralysis.
In our situation, the “tokhang” style of legalized repression and extra-judicial killings is justified by the Anti-Terror Law. The seeming connivance of both Houses of Congress and the Judiciary and the seeming voluntary obedience of the people to this way of doing things is provided for by the demagoguery of populism and its populist leader. Pope Francis provides a prophetic analysis of populism and populist leadership when he says:
individuals are able to exploit politically a people’s culture, under whatever ideological banner, for their own personal advantage or continuing grip on power. Or when, at other times, they seek popularity by appealing to the basest and most selfish inclinations of certain sectors of the population. This becomes all the more serious when, whether in cruder or more subtle forms, it leads to the usurpation of institutions and laws.
(Fratelli Tutti, 159)
This is the social context of our reflection today on Activism and the Christian Prophetic Tradition. The problematique that we must face in this situation is this: Shall we, out of fear, cower and cease to be activists, or shall we overcome fear and transcend it and assert our activism? Or shall we be carried away by anger, and unleash our activism to its limits, and let this anger construct that better world? Or can anger – just anger – construct a better world? Or more profoundly still, can we still get in touch with the core of our being and behold the qualities of our humanity, or shall we allow the beast, the animal and the baser and basest instincts in us to triumph over and rule our being? What are our choices?
The words of Paul come to mind, thus:
We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be made visible in our bodies. For while we live, we are always being given up to death for Jesus’ sake, so that the life of Jesus may be made visible in our mortal flesh.
(2 Cor 4:7-11)
Activism, Anyone?
In the time prior to, during and shortly after Martial Law and the Marcos Dictatorship, activism was a prized word. It conjured the image of deep serious scientific study and rigorous critical thinking, of preferential option for the poor and leaving one’s comfortable home, convent and institutional work and routine in favor of the messy, exciting, dangerous and adventurous life with the poor and the adoption of their smell, sweat and struggle to eke out a living.
It was an exciting time for student activists who demanded academic freedom, recognition of student power and non-commercialization of schools and education. It meant commitment to the cause of national freedom against US imperialism, Soviet revisionist expansionism and Chinese social imperialism on the one hand, and social emancipation from domestic feudal landlordism, government corruption and big business control of an economy that basically catered to foreign interests on the other. Many of them dropped out of school in order to learn from the masses and develop an alternative education which their studies could not interfere.
The progressive members of the Church and the religious, inspired by the aggiornamento of Vatican II, took this activism to heart. Priests, sisters and those in formation in their clerical and religious habits picketed the huge party of an haciendero that had a fountain flowing with champaigne. They lived with the sacada of Negros, and it was a young Jesuit priest, Fr. Arsenio Jesena, SJ who exposed the oppressive, exploitative, unjust condition of the sacada in the hands of the contratista and the haciendero. (Fr. Arsenio Jesena, SJ, The Sacadas of Sugarland, authorsden.com). A French diocesan clergy came to introduce to the Filipino clergy the life and work of “worker-priests”, priests who worked in the factories to earn in order to live like any other worker, without forsaking their sacramental and pastoral duties. Nuns left their convents and institutional works and lived with the peasants, the lumad, and the urban poor, so that their spirituality, theology and life would articulate the Gospel values of Jesus’ preferential love for the poor. The ICM, the CFIC (later called SFIC), the RGS, the MSM, the m.a., the Maryknoll and the Columbans were at the forefront of this new movement of renewing and liberating the Church from within. Priests and religious got involved in organizing cooperatives among farmers and workers; their ministry became more holistic, integrating liturgical-sacramental renewal with social action that were humanitarian-developmental and later, with the work for justice, peace, integrity of creation and liberation. Literature and communications facilities thrived that not only announced the spirituality and theology of the Church but also proclaimed the life of the Church in the Modern World: the Impact Magazine, the Ichthys, the Ang Tao magazine, the movie Sugat sa Ugat of the Communication Foundation for Asia, and the radio stations of the religious and the dioceses.
In initial formation, seminarians clamored for renewal in formation in light of the vision of Vatican II. They organized themselves into the Inter-Seminary Forum of the Philippines. They studied the Ratio Fundamentalis and proposed changes. The bishops accepted the seminarians’ proposals. The fruit of this activism is manifold: seminary training would now include secular courses like social work, organizational and financial management, exposure and immersion programs, a year of socio-pastoral experience, student government in the seminary and an independent seminary publication. Probably most notable was the establishment of new seminaries designed to be formation houses in the bosom of the people’s quest for justice, peace and liberation: the experimental theology schools pioneered by Fr. Carlos Abesamis, SJ in Quezon City, Fr. Rodulfo “Dong” Galenzoga in Lanao del Norte, and the Inter-Congregational Theological Center also in Quezon City.
In liturgy, this activism in the Church produced the Misa ng Sambayanang Pilipino, a project of the seminarians of the CICM under the tutelage of Fr. Anscar Chupungco, OSB. In theater arts, Pagsambang Bayan of Boni Ilagan was a hit musical that merged the mass of salvation with the struggle of the poor for freedom and liberation under Martial Law and the Marcos Dictatorship. Theologically, the historical development of this activism in the Church and society produced the Theology of Struggle. This identity of doing theology in the Philippine setting was coined by Fr. Luis Hechanova, CSsR.