The Asian Social Institute (ASI), the National Secretariat for Social Action (NASSA) of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), Kaya Natin Movement for Good Governance and Ethical Leadership, Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas, ChaCharot: Samahan ng Tutol sa Charter Change, and the Urban Poor Associates, are jointly convening a Kongreso ng Taumbayan, to insist that national decision-making must include the opinions most important stakeholders: the poor.
The Kongreso brings national focus to the issues that matter the most: food security, quality and sanctity of life, and the chance for a better future for all.
These issues should take up the time wasted on the attempt to change the Constitution.
Rice, EJK, and the TRAIN that struck the poor badly —BIGAS, TODAS, HAMPAS — preoccupy the poor.
Supposedly, these issues will be addressed by charter change. A shift to a Federal form of government —according to the Administration mouthpieces — will guarantee equitable distribution of resources and fully decentralized governance Therefore, they say: sure-fire food on the table, available work, wellbeing.
But the facts are clear. Today’s scandalous price of rice, the even more horrible prospect of no rice to buy, the constant threat of death by execution or as collateral damage in poor communities, and the extreme trials of the daily commute and extremely low buying capacity —among many other Calvaries endured by the poor—clearly shows that the welfare of the poor is last on the minds of the present Administration.
Even if Federalism proves a good option in the future, in the hands of the Administration today, any turn to Federalism will lead to anti-poor, anti-democracy outcomes.
Objectives
The Kongreso ng Mamamayan is convened, therefore, to set our priorities right as a nation.
Place the poor at front and center of national policy: this is the mantra of the gathering. Make sure there is food to eat at affordable prices, work available at decent wages, and efficient ways to travel to and from work—even before demanding more sacrifices in the name of so-called progress. In fact, all government policy and programs cannot be progressive if decision-making happened only among politicians.