Final Document of the Synod of Bishops on Young People, Faith and Vocational Discernment

Content:
INTRODUCTION

PREAMBLE

PART I “HE WALKED WITH THEM”
Chapter 1 A Listening Church
Chapter II Three crucial Elements
Chapter III Identity and relations
Chapter IV Being young Today

PART II “THEIR EYES WERE OPENED”
Chapter I The gift of Youth
Chapter II The Mystery of Vocation
Chapter III The mission to accompany
Chapter IV The Art of Discernment

PART III THEY SET OFF WITHOUT DELAY
Chapter I The Missionary Synodality of the Church
Chapter II Walking together in daily life
Chapter III Renewed Missionary Vigour
Chapter IV Integral Formation

CONCLUSION

***

INTRODUCTION

The Synodal event that we experienced

1. “I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams” (Acts 2:17; cf. Joel 3:1). This is what we experienced during the Synod, walking together and listening out for the voice of the Spirit. He astonished us with the wealth of his gifts, he filled us with his courage and his strength so as to bring hope to the world.

We journeyed together, with the Successor of Peter, who strengthened us in faith and gave us fresh vigour and enthusiasm for the mission. Even though we came from widely differing backgrounds in cultural and ecclesial terms, we were aware from the outset of a spiritual bond uniting us, a desire for dialogue and a real empathy. We worked together, sharing our deepest concerns, communicating our anxieties, not concealing our burdens. Many of the interventions touched us deeply and awakened our evangelical compassion: we felt as one body, suffering and rejoicing together. We want to share with everyone the grace that we experienced and we want to pass on the joy of the Gospel to our Churches and to the whole world.

The presence of young people was a new departure: through them the voice of a whole generation was heard loud and clear at the Synod. Journeying with them as pilgrims to the tomb of Peter, we experienced how coming together in this way creates the conditions for the Church to become a space for dialogue and a witness to a life-giving fraternity. The strength of this experience overcomes all weariness and weakness. The Lord continues to say to us again and again: Do not be afraid, I am with you.

The process of preparation

2. We drew great benefit from the contributions of the episcopates and from the insights of pastors, religious, laypersons, experts, teachers and many others. From the outset the young people were involved in the synodal process: the online questionnaire, the large number of personal contributions and above all the Presynodal Meeting were an eloquent indication of this. Their contribution was essential, just as in the story of the loaves and the fish: Jesus was able to perform the miracle thanks to the helpful actions of a boy who generously offered what he had (cf. Jn 6:8-11).

All the contributions were summarized in the Instrumentum Laboris, which provided a solid basis for discussion throughout the weeks of the Assembly. Now the Final Document gathers together the results of this process and launches it into the future: it expresses what the Synod Fathers recognized, interpreted and chose in the light of God’s Word.

The Final Document of the Synodal Assembly

3. It is important to clarify the relationship between the Instrumentum Laboris and the Final Document. The former is the comprehensive and synthetic frame of reference that emerged from two years of listening; the latter is the fruit of the discernment that followed and it draws together thematically the key discussion points that the Synod Fathers focused on with particular intensity and passion. So we recognize the diversity and the complementarity of these two texts.

The present Document is offered to the Holy Father (cf. Francis, Episcopalis Communio, 18; Instruction, art. 35 §5) and also to the whole Church as a fruit of this Synod. Since the Synodal process is not yet over and the phase of implementation is still to come (cf. Episcopalis Communio, 19-21), the Final Document will be a roadmap for the next steps the Church is called to take.

* In the present document the term “Synod” may refer to the entire Synodal process or else to the General Assembly held from 3 to 28 October 2018.

PREAMBLE

Jesus journeys with the Emmaus disciples

4. We took the account of the journey to Emmaus (cf Lk 24:13-35) as a paradigmatic text for understanding the Church’s mission to younger generations. This passage expresses well what we experienced at the Synod and what we would like every one of our particular Churches to be able to experience in relation to the young. Jesus walks with these two disciples who have not grasped the meaning of what happened to him, while they are moving away from Jerusalem and from the community. So as to be in their company, he walks alongside them. He asks them questions and he listens patiently to their version of events, so as to help them recognize what they are experiencing.

Then, with affection and energy, he proclaims the Word to them, leading them to interpret the events they have experienced in the light of the Scriptures. He accepts the invitation to stay with them as evening falls: he enters into their night. As they listen, their hearts burn within them and their minds are enlightened; in the breaking of bread their eyes are opened. It is they who then choose to resume their journey at once in the opposite direction, to return to the community, sharing the experience of their encounter with the Risen Lord.

In continuity with the Instrumentum Laboris, the Final Document consists of three parts which correspond to the stages of this Gospel story. The first part is entitled “He walked with them” (Lk 24:15) and it seeks to illuminate what the Synod Fathers recognized of the context in which the young find themselves, highlighting its strengths and its challenges. The second part, “Their eyes were opened” (Lk 24:31), is interpretative and it provides some fundamental tools for understanding the synodal theme. The third part, entitled “They set out at once” (Lk 24:33), presents the choices for a spiritual, pastoral and missionary conversion.

PART I
He WALKED WITH THEM”

5. “That very day, two of them were going to a village named Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem, and talking with each other about all these things that had happened. While they were talking and discussing together, Jesus himself drew near and went with them” (Lk 24:13-15).

In this passage the evangelist conveys the need of the two wayfarers to search for meaning in the events they have lived through. He focuses especially on the attitude of Jesus who joins them on their journey. The Risen Lord wants to walk alongside all young people, hearing their expectations, even those that are unmet, and their hopes, even those that are paltry. Jesus walks, listens and shares.

Chapter 1

A Listening Church
Listening and seeing with empathy
The value of listening

6. Listening is an encounter in freedom, which requires humility, patience, readiness to understand, and a commitment to formulate the answers in a new way. Listening transforms the hearts of those who do it, especially when it takes place with an interior disposition of harmony and docility to the Spirit. So it is not just a gathering of information, nor is it a strategy for achieving a goal, but it is the manner in which God himself relates to his people. God sees the wretchedness of his people and he hears their cry, he is deeply moved and he comes down to deliver them (cf. Ex 3:7-8). The Church, through listening, enters into the movement of God who, in his Son, comes close to every human being.

The young want to be heard

7. The young are called to make constant choices that give direction to their lives; they express the desire to be heard, recognized, accompanied. Many find that their voice is not considered interesting or useful in social and ecclesial circles. In some situations little attention is paid to their cry, particularly the cry of the poor and the exploited – few older people are willing and able to listen to them.

Listening in the Church

8. In the Church there are plenty of initiatives and consolidated experiences that can offer young people an experience of acceptance, listening and making themselves heard. The Synod recognizes, though, that the ecclesial community does not always succeed in conveying the attitude shown by Jesus towards the Emmaus disciples, when he asked them, before enlightening them with the Word, “What is this conversation which you are holding with each other as you walk?” (Lk 24:17).

Sometimes there can be a tendency to provide pre-packaged answers and ready-made solutions, without allowing the young people’s questions to emerge in their freshness and engaging with the challenges they pose.

Listening makes possible an exchange of gifts in a context of empathy. It allows young people to make their own contribution to the community, helping it to grasp new sensitivities and to consider new questions. At the same time it sets the conditions for a proclamation of the Gospel that can truly touch the heart, incisively and fruitfully.

Listening as practised by pastors and qualified laypersons

9. Listening is a key element in the ministry of pastors, above all in that of bishops, although bishops are frequently burdened by many duties and they struggle to find enough time for this essential service. Many have pointed out the shortage of qualified people dedicated to accompaniment. Belief in the theological and pastoral value of listening implies the need to rethink and renew the ways in which priestly ministry is ordinarily exercised and to conduct a review of its priorities. Moreover, the Synod recognizes the need to prepare consecrated persons and laypersons, male and female, who are qualified to accompany young people. The charism of listening that the Holy Spirit calls forth within the communities might also receive institutional recognition as a form of ecclesial service.

The variety of contexts and cultures
A plural world

10. The very composition of the Synod brought out the presence and the contribution of many different regions of the world, highlighting the beauty of being a universal Church. Notwithstanding a context of growing globalization, the Synod Fathers asked that the many differences between contexts and cultures, even within a single country, be duly noted. The plurality of young people’s worlds is so great that in some countries there is a tendency to use the term “youth” in the plural.

Moreover, the age range considered by the present Synod (16-29 years) does not represent a homogeneous category, but is made up of different groups each with their own life experience.

All these differences have a profound impact on young people’s concrete experience: they affect the different phases of maturing, the forms of religious experience, the structure of the family and its importance for the transmission of the faith, relations between generations – as for example the role of the elderly and the respect due to them – ways of participating in the life of society, attitudes towards the future, ecumenical and interreligious questions. The Synod recognizes and accepts the richness of the diversity of cultures and puts itself at the service of the communion of the Spirit.

Changes that are taking place

11. Of particular significance is the difference in demographic dynamics between countries with a high birthrate, where young people represent a significant and growing proportion of the population, and those in which the influence of the young is on the wane. A further differentiating factor is the result of history: there are countries and continents of ancient Christian tradition, whose culture is marked by a memory that is not to be lightly dismissed, but there are also countries and continents marked by other religious traditions, in which Christianity is a minority presence – often a recent one.

In other territories again, the Christian communities and the young people who belong to them suffer persecution.

Exclusion and marginalization

12. Then there are differences between countries – and within countries – caused by the structure of society and the economic power that separates, dramatically at times, those with access to the increasing opportunities offered by globalization from those who live on the margins of society or in the rural world and who find themselves excluded or discarded. A number of interventions signalled the need for the Church to align herself courageously on their side and to help build alternatives that remove exclusion and marginalization, reinforcing acceptance, accompaniment and integration.

This highlights the need to be aware of the indifference that affects many Christians too, so as to overcome it by deepening the social dimension of the faith.

Men and women

13. Nor must we overlook the difference between men and women with their characteristic gifts, their specific sensitivities and their experiences of life. This difference can give rise to forms of domination, exclusion and discrimination, from which all societies, including the Church, need to be liberated.

The Bible presents man and woman as equal partners before God (cf. Gen 5:2): all domination and discrimination based on sex is an offence against human dignity. The Bible also presents the difference between the sexes as a mystery that is constitutive of the human being and cannot be reduced to stereotypes. The relation between man and woman is understood in terms of a vocation to live together in reciprocity and in dialogue, in communion and in fruitfulness (cf. Gen 1:27-29; 2:21-25) in every area of human experience: life as a couple, work, education and so on. God has entrusted the earth to their covenant.

Cultural colonization

14. Many Synod Fathers coming from non-Western contexts point out that in their countries globalization brings with it forms of cultural colonization which uproot young people from their cultural and religious origins. The Church needs to make a commitment to accompany them in this process so that they do not lose sight of the most precious features of their identity.

There are contrasting interpretations of the process of secularization. Some see it as a welcome opportunity to be purified from a religiosity based on mere custom or on ethnic and national identities, while others see it as an obstacle to the transmission of the faith. In secular societies we are also witnessing a rediscovery of God and of spirituality. For the Church this should act as a stimulus to recover the importance of the dynamisms of faith, proclamation and pastoral accompaniment

A first look at the Church of today

The Church’s involvement in education

15. There are many regions where young people see the Church as a force that is alive and engaging, of significance also for their contemporaries who do not believe or who belong to other religions. The Church’s educational institutions seek to welcome all young people, irrespective of their religious choices, their cultural origins and their personal, family or social situation. In this way the Church makes a fundamental contribution to the integral education of the young in many different parts of the world. This happens through education in schools of every shape and size, in centres of professional formation, in colleges and in universities, but also in youth centres and oratories; this commitment is also demonstrated through the welcome given to refugees and the great variety of forms of social engagement. In all these ways the Church unites her witness and her proclamation of the Gospel to her educational work and her human promotion. When inspired by intercultural and interreligious dialogue, the Church’s educational activity is appreciated even by non-Christians as an authentic form of human promotion.

Activities in youth ministry

16. As the Synod progressed, it became clear that youth ministry needs a vocational slant, and that vocational pastoral care should be directed towards all young people. It was emphasized that pastoral programmes need to address the whole period from infancy through to adult life, helping the young to find their place in the Christian community. It was also noted that numerous parish groups, movements and youth associations already offer an effective process of accompaniment and formation for the young in their life of faith.

Continue reading

A Gathering for Truth, Justice and Peace

14 January 2019

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

The peace and love of the Lord!

It is with great hope and fervor that we wish your presence in this very important day: One Faith, One Nation, One Voice: A Gathering for Truth, Justice and Peace, January 25, 2019, from 4 to 7 pm at the Rajah Sulayman Plaza, Malate, Manila.

In the spirit of the observation of the Bible Month and the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity led by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines and the National Council of Churches in the Philippines, we encourage everyone to express our unity in faith and action and proclaim Truth, Justice and Peace in this challenging time. Attached is the concept note of said event.

Our prophetic witness is our most wilful instrument in celebrating God’s gift of life and dignity and in following Christ’s work of mercy and justice. Just like how Jesus led his disciples, come and see, and be counted in the community of Christians proclaiming One Voice as One Nation in One Faith.

For more details, you may reach the event secretariat through Mr. Nardy Sabino of the Promotion of Church People’s Response at (02) 925-1786 or 09283162109.

Thank you!


Members of the Ecumenical Bishops Forum gathered with the thousands of protesters in Rizal Park, Manila, on Sept. 21, 2017 marking the 45th year of martial law in the Philippines. It was also called a “National Day of Protest.” Among the bishops were, second from left, retired United Methodist Bishop Solito K.Toquero and, fifth from left, Manila area Bishop Ciriaco Q. Francisco. Photo courtesy of Ofelia A. Cantor

From our different Christian traditions, sects, and denominations, we come together in a prophetic chorus to proclaim that we have been called to choose LIFE (Deuteronomy 30:15-29), to defend the rights of the poor and needy (Proverbs 31:9), and to declare the favourable year of the Lord for justice and freedom.

As much as ever, our FAITH is both tested and strengthened, as we engage mission and ministry to work for truth, justice and peace in our NATION, which continues to face a crisis of truth, intensive poverty, violations of human rights and widespread killings.

The Christian imperative to defend human dignity and promote the respect of God-given LIFE unites us in ONE VOICE so that our people will know God’s intention for justice to roll down like a never-ending stream (Amos 5:24), so that peace may be known throughout the land.

Date: 4-7PM, January 25, 2019 Place: Rajah Sulayman Plaza, Malate, Manila (facing Roxas Boulevard)

Objectives

 To uplift our courage and common testimony as a community that stands for what is true, honest, just, and good (Philippians 4:8), as a bold public witness for peace and good governance in the Philippines

 To renew our commitment to defend life and to love of country and people, specially the poor, exploited, and marginalized

 To call on the faithful to join in ONE VOICE in speaking the truth and promoting justice and peace in our families, communities and nation

Join us for prayers, songs, testimonies, solidarity messages, and a candle-lighting (or human chain) for truth, justice and peace in the Philippines! Come be a part of the program.

Critique of Resolution of Both Houses No. 15:

Charter Change under Pres. Rodrigo Duterte and Speaker Gloria Arroyo

A Paper by Atty. Neri Javier Colmenares
DRAFT (December 21, 2018)

Introduction: Worst ChaCha Ever

The current charter change embodied in Resolution of Both Houses No. 15 is, in reality, nothing more than efforts of self-interested politicians to amend the Constitution to perpetuate themselves in power and at the same time further open up the country to rapacious transnational corporations and worsen poverty in the Philippines. Additionally, it deletes and dilutes social justice and human rights provisions while proposing a hybrid federal system which could wreak political and economic havoc in the  country.

Worse, there is a twist in RBH 15 that gives it a chance to be approved, even by the previously non-supportive Senate. Months ago, many were lulled into thinking that the moves to amend the 1987 Constitution is dead, until December 11 2018, when RBH 15 (mainly authored by Speaker Gloria Arroyo) was swiftly approved by the House of Representatives. 

The railroading of RBH 15 is the reason why we cannot be complacent with regards ChaCha even if some senators have proclaimed that “ChaCha is dead on arrival.” This Arroyo ChaCha is different because it contains provisions meant to entice the entire Senate into approving it. 

While RBH 15 professes to being about federalism, it does not actually prescribe a federal system but mainly focuses on provisions that Speaker Arroyo pushed during her three ChaCha attempts when she was President, namely: term extension through cancellation of election, elimination of term limits, and deleting provisions aimed at protecting the economy from transnational corporations and foreign control. Speaker Arroyo and her congressmen then made ChaCha more palatable to politicians by deleting the prohibition against political dynasties which is currently contained in the 1987 Constitution.

Speaker Arroyo, who has long-espoused deleting the provisions restricting foreign ownership of land and other natural resources, has finally succeeded in passing her proposals through RBH 15. This ChaCha will not only constitutionalize self-serving provisions but also take away our last constitutional defenses against countries like China from gobbling up our lands and natural resources. This attempt to force us to dance the ChaCha is serious and cannot be hastily dismissed.

RBH 15 enticing to Senators: The Need to Monitor the Senate

RBH 15 is a trap to entice all Senators, including those who initially opposed it, to approve Charter Change. The Senators who previously opposed ChaCha did so because of two reasons. First, because most of the ChaCha proposals asserted that both the Senate and the House vote jointly, and second, because these proposals practically diminish the power of the Senate by turning it into a regional forum of senators elected by region. One ChaCha proposal even abolished the Senate completely.

What RBH 15 has done is eliminate these obstacles to senatorial support, as it has deviously retained the same powerful Senate under the 1987 Constitution, and has agreed to separate voting by the Senators. RBH 15 also added icing to the cake it is serving the Senators by eliminating term limits, deleting the constitutional ban on political dynasties and opening up the possibility of term extension by cancelling the 2019 elections. All these moves aim to make RBH 15 irresistible to some senators. To cap the trap, RBH 15 does not contain any substantial provisions on federalism, making the Senators less wary of a sudden shift to a federal structure. 

Never has ChaCha been so near to approval than now, and it is wrong for us to assume that pro-ChaCha forces will not exploit this once-in-a-lifetime window of opportunity to change the Constitution.  These are the reasons why we cannot be complacent. We cannot dismiss this as something that will not pass in the Senate, because this is a different ChaCha from those the body had previously opposed. 

We need to monitor any ChaCha movement in the Senate during the period of January 14 to February 12 2019.  If there is a move to tackle Cha Cha during this period then we need to actively oppose this in the Senate. The truth is, if it manages to get Senate approval it will be difficult to battle ChaCha in the plebiscite — the resources of the administration of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte have been used to campaign for ChaCha (whatever proposal that might be) since 2016. Public officials down to the lowest municipal councilors will predictably support this, as it will mean staying in power until 2022. The current repressive political conditions will also undoubtedly make it difficult to campaign against ChaCha before the plebiscite. 

Continue reading

2019: Another challenging year for Battle-scarred Mining Communities and Environmental Defenders

PMPI Statement | January 11, 2019

Various mine sites in the Philippines. Photos are from (in no particular order): Mark Saludes, SIKSI, PMPI, & from the internet.

We, from the Philippine Misereor Partnership, Inc. (PMPI) along with our partner-communities struggling to halt active mining operations in their areas and demanding rehabilitation for abandoned mines, see 2019 as another challenging year in our battle against destructive mining.

During the Holidays, DENR Undersecretary Analiza was jovial announcing that a robust mining industry is in the horizon come 2019 with reference to possible lifting of moratorium on the issuance of new mining permits given the passage of House Bill 8400, a new mining law rationalizing mining industry fiscal regime.

 “How ironic,” said PMPI National Coordinator Yoly R. Esguerra. “How can the DENR Undersecretary be happy about possible upsurge of mining activities that destroy people, culture and environment, when she is from an agency that supposed to protect the environment.

House Bill 8400, An Act Establishing the Fiscal Regime for the Mining Industry shepherded by Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is sadly the first of the few signs that indeed 2019 will become an excellent year for mining companies, undeniably a backdrop of growing aggression against communities and the natural environment. Add to this is the planned TRAIN Law II or the Tax Reform Acceleration and Inclusion dubbed as “TRABAHO” Law, purportedly seeking further rationalization and increase in revenue for the government.

The mining company ecstatically hailed these progressive moves in taxation; moves that will burden many people, moves that WE will not submit and succumbed to as trap.

The HB 8400 and TRAIN Law II for PMPI, are but a clear attempt by this administration to hoodwink the public to appear that a new comprehensive policy framework has been installed to guide the mineral extraction industry in the country. However, highlighting the increased revenues that these policies will generate, it is but a short-sighted intervention perhaps only to comply to a provision in Executive Order 79 Series of 2012 issued by the Aquino Administration that requires a new legislation on mining tax – “No new mineral agreements shall be entered into until a legislation rationalizing existing revenue sharing schemes and mechanisms shall have taken effect. The DENR may continue to grant and issue Exploration Permits under existing laws, rules, and guidelines.” (Sec. 4 Grant of Mineral Agreements Pending New Legislation).

Assuming both policies become effective at extracting revenues for the government, nowhere in the taxing scheme do we see payments for ecosystem services (e.g. carbon sequestration of forests) that will be affected by mining operations, nor just compensation for communities that will be forced out of their homes or for livelihood that will be lost e.g. Agriculture/Food production.

Indeed, 2019 will be a banner year for mining corporations if this government finally gives-in to the pleading and lobbying of the mining industry despite numerous statements by President Rodrigo Duterte that he is against open-pit mining and that the Philippines is better-off without mining. 

For PMPI and SOS Communities, our position remains the same, lopsided policies such as HB 8400 and the proposed TRAIN Law II are anything but money for the government and the mining industry, and continued development aggression against the environment and communities.    

__________________________________________________________________

The Philippine Misereor Partnership Inc. (PMPI) is a social development and advocacy network of 250 plus Philippine church/faith-based groups, non-governmental organizations and people’s organization spread all over the country, in partnership with Misereor, a social development arm of the German Bishops based in Aachen, Germany.

Position Paper on the Planned 300-MW SMC Global Coal-Fired Power Plant in San Carlos City

“We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels – especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas – needs to be progressively replaced without delay… There is an urgent need to develop policies so that, in the next few years, the emission of carbon dioxide and other highly polluting gases can be drastically reduced, for example, substituting for fossil fuels and developing sources of renewable energy. Worldwide there is minimal access to clean and renewable energy. There is still a need to develop adequate storage technologies.”

(Pope Francis, Laudato Si’ (LS), 165 & 26. Emphasis added).

Urgent Appeal for Climate Justice!

The Catholic Church supports the protection of our common good and our common home. We believe that progress can be achieved by sustainable and climate-friendly means. Hence, the Diocese of San Carlos is in opposition with the planned 300-MW coal plant of San Miguel Corporation (SMC) Global. We strongly appeal to them to invest instead their capital in “developing sources of renewable energy” (LS, 26), ever mindful that — if we do not listen to the earnest appeal of the Holy Father, Pope Francis, as quoted above — the most vulnerable victims of such decision with irreversible consequences to our environment are the poorest people.

The call to care for people on the margins of society and our responsibility to care for the diversity of life on Earth, including the ecological systems that support life, are integral to the living out of our mission as followers of Christ for there is a close bond between concern for nature and justice for the poor. These should also inform our considerations on how we ought to invest our God-given resources. As committed disciples of the Lord, we are seriously challenged “to hear both the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor” (LS, 49).

We need to point out the “double injustice of climate change” brought about by our lack of care for our common home — The poor who are more vulnerable to suffer the most from extreme weather events like floods, landslides and typhoons, increasing water scarcity, reductions in crop yields, and rising sea levels that impact coastal cities are the least responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions — for the fewer goods and services one consumes, the less greenhouse gas emissions one produces.

“What kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to children who are now growing up?” (LS, 160)

Philippines lies sixth on the list of most vulnerable countries in the Global Climate Risk Index of 2018. The country recently experienced some of the strongest typhoons in history – Typhoons Yolanda, Lando and Ompong, to which we lost thousands of Filipino lives and billions worth of damaged properties. Negros felt the wrath of these disasters in terms of livelihood, human displacement and agricultural loss.

Our government acknowledged the need to eliminate fossil fuels and fast-track renewable energy through RA 9153. It also ratified the Paris Agreement last year. This aims to limit global temperature rise below 2°C through low carbon development, adaptation and mitigation.

Department of Energy’s Philippine Energy Plan 2012-2030 is aligned with national development directives and global policy frameworks on energy such as the UN Sustainable Energy for All Initiative and the APEC Green Growth Goals. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) wrote in its 700-page most important scientific report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C released last October 7, 2018 that we have just 12 years left to make immediate, massive and unprecedented changes to global energy infrastructure to limit global warming to moderate levels because failure to do so would mean rising sea levels, more devastating droughts and more damaging storms resulting to famine, disease, economic tolls, and refugee crises. Meeting this goal demands extraordinary transitions in transportation; in energy, land, and building infrastructure; and in industrial systems. It means reducing our current coal consumption by one-third. Therefore, approval of a coal project in Negros will absolutely be in disagreement with these contracts, goals and findings.

Would the Claimed Benefits of Coal far outweigh Its hidden Costs?

San Carlos City was recognized by United Nations as one of the most livable cities in the world. It is  considered as the energy hub of the Philippines and Southeast Asia with its biofuel and solar energy, together with the entire Negros. Not only will a new coal plant stain these existing global recognitions and honors; it will pollute as well the commons (water, air, land), harm human health and downturn community resilience.

It is a human right to live in a clean, healthy and safe environment. All over the country, host communities of coal suffer from health crisis, including premature deaths attributed to currently operating power plants. Recorded attributable diseases are cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive heart disease, lung cancer and lower respiratory infections. These are caused by toxic heavy metals present in coal ash.

Moreover, the issue of coal is a financial and economic issue. The coal-fired power plant will also deprive residents from enjoying clean and cheap energy from renewable resources.

Fossil fuels expedite climate change. And the impacts of climate change are costly – more than what our country could afford.

Prof. Myles Allen, from Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK, made this valuable observation:

“One of the key insights to emerge from physical climate science over the past decade is the longevity of fossil carbon emissions. Once we release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, its influence persists indefinitely, continuing to affect the weather and climate for thousands of years. So our emissions today will affect our great-greatgrandchildren, unless an intervening generation steps in and pumps that carbon dioxide back out of the atmosphere and ‘refossilizes’ it, a process that would be formidably costly and may not be feasible at all.”

Then he asked a very disturbing and hard question: “But how do we weigh our responsibilities to our distant descendants, who will undoubtedly be living in a very different world to our own, socially, economically and environmentally, against our responsibilities to the poor who are alive today? On an even broader scale, how do we value harm done to the present generation against harm done to the next generation and generations to come?”

Our Pastoral Challenge and Collective Response

We call on the local government of San Carlos City and the provincial government of Negros Occidental to disapprove any proposal or application of SMC Global or any company at all for a coal-fired power plant project. We encourage Negrosanons and local business industries to continue their real efforts towards a more sustainable and cleaner environment. As stewards of the Earth and as individuals with common needs, it is our duty to take care of our home and love our neighbors as we love ourselves.

Our country, as signatory to the Paris Agreement, should consistently pledge for a greener future. Our national and local government institutions must start addressing climate change issues with solutions-based approaches in accord with the agreement. Locally, as a community of faith concerned for the future of our planet and people, we recommend the following:

• Pledge to reduce emissions, in line with keeping the global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels; insist on rapid emissions reduction and peaking by 2030, in order to keep the 1.5°C limit within reach;

• Aim for 1.5°C, encouraging all efforts to reach this limit, which would mean more communities are protected, more people get to survive;

• Demand divestment in fossil fuels and transition to 100% renewables by 2050, and encourage our power sector in the business community to reinvest in renewables and alternative green solutions;

• Advocate the long-term adaptation goal to reduce the vulnerability and build the resilience of communities facing climate impacts, aware that many of our communities are vulnerable to climate related disasters;

• Commit to make San Carlos City an eco-sustainable city, rejecting profit-driven businesses in the guise of development (mining, coal-fired power plants, reclamation development, pollution causing factories and all others that can destroy our environment and communities);

• Involve our barangays for a better climate, for a better environment and for a better governance;

• Involve our communities, churches, schools, organizations and citizenry to be vigilant on environmental issues, promote integral environmental formation, and active mobilization for ecological engagement; and,

Continue reading

Collegial Pastoral Statement On Proposed Coal-Fired Power Plant

From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required…” – (Luke 12:48)

Dioceses of Bacolod, Dumaguete, Kabankalan & San Carlos

Negros Island is so rich in history, culture, and God-given biodiversity and natural resources, surrounded by an abundance of sunlight. Indeed, our island is a renewable energy hub, marked not only by solar farms but more significantly by the expansion of distributed renewable energy generation that truly gives – and brings – power to the people.

In his Encyclical Letter, Laudato Si: On Care for Our Common Home, Pope Francis calls for ecological conversion, for humanity to reduce consumption of coal and other fossil fuels that are major contributors to climate change, and to embrace an energy future that is clean, renewable, and equitable – for the health and well-being of our planet and for our future generations.

Our beloved Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle has stated in no uncertain terms that poor people around the world suffer greatly from the climate crisis and fossil fuels are among the main drivers of this injustice.

We are one with our Holy Father in issuing the urgent call to ecological conversion.

Moreover, we recognize that this begins at home, and it begins with each and every one of us.

There are already 9 solar power plants, 8 biomass plants, and 10 hydropower plants in all of Negros with a combined capacity of 579.43 MW. In our dioceses, we are increasingly demonstrating that sustainable energy practices work for us and for our communities. Decentralized rooftop solar energy systems in the dioceses of Bacolod and San Carlos, for example, show how small-scale distributed renewable energy generation is climate-friendly, sustainable, and affordable. The local churches of Dumaguete and Kabankalan are equally committed to seriously implement the Laudato Sí Challenge of the Holy Father and are finding concrete ways to safeguard our environment. These are strongly indicative of the bright future of renewable energy all throughout the province.

In fact, Negros Occidental has been dubbed the Renewable Energy Capital of the Philippines. In 2015, the National Grid Corp. of the Philippines (NGCP) stated that Occidental will have the biggest power supply in Western Visayas by 2016, even higher than that of the whole Panay Island.

Data presented by the transmission utility during the Power 102 Seminar and Project Promotion in Bacolod City on November 2015 showed that the province has a potential power supply of 1,028.2 megawatts (MW) for 2016.

Seventy-five percent of this projected power supply is contributed by solar power plants all throughout the province. The power demand of the Negros is reported to be 288 MW thus, there is a projected power excess of about 740 MW.

National Renewable Energy Board Chairman Jose Layug stated in 2017’s Negros Renewable Energy Summit that the region has biomass energy sources that can serve as base load on top of solar and hydro power. DOE also said that with Negros Island’s renewable energy sources, it is poised to become an entirely “green” region by 2030.

Not only is renewable energy functional and accessible, it is also competitive and more affordable. Coal-driven power will never truly be cheap, especially when we factor in the numerous environmental, social, and health costs associated with its usage. In fact, solar power is increasingly becoming the lowest-cost energy option. And with the continuing emergence of storage solutions, renewables will provide greater resiliency and energy independence, immune from the unpredictability of global commodity prices.

From the ground up, a global movement is spreading through major sectors – from banks that will no longer finance coal projects to companies, governments, and faith communities that are divesting from fossil fuels and investing instead in climate-friendly, renewable technologies.

Even entire countries such as the U.K, Canada, Marshall Islands, Costa Rica, Ethiopia and others have established a growing international alliance to phase out coal. Asia is on a similar path with China’s coal consumption continuing to fall as it invests increasingly in renewables, while India aims to install 100GW of solar energy by 2022.

And yet, the dark specter of fossil fuels remains with a proposed coal-fired plant in San Carlos City, hanging over our future, exacerbating climate change, threatening our resources, our environment, our health, and our sustainable development. This, despite the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence that led the U.N. Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change or IPCC to urge the phasing out of fossil fuels, stating that coal-fired electricity must end by 2050 to address climate change and its dangerous impacts.

Moreover, a coal-fired power plant will take many years and millions to build, adding to our long-term collective debt, and with no accounting for all its social, environmental, and health impacts. Each year, coal-fired plants pump out 146,000 tons of PM2.5, a form of particulate matter roughly 40 times smaller than a grain of sand. They also pump out 197,000 tons of PM10 pollution, a form of particulate matter or dust that is small enough to slip through a typical mesh filter. Studies have long linked these forms of pollution with increased rates of asthma and other respiratory diseases, translating also into billions of pesos in health care costs and lost productivity.

Just recently, over 150 representatives from different sectors culminated a long process of meetings to map out the Negros Island Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan to preserve our wondrous natural heritage. Around the same time, the governors of both Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental reiterated their categorical opposition to unsustainable coal-fired power plants.

Let us stand firm together in Negros — with each other and with our civic leaders — to oppose any new coal-fired power plants and to phase out those still in operation, collectively affirming the message of Pope Francis:

“Our desire to ensure energy for all must not lead to the undesired effect of a spiral of extreme climate changes due to a catastrophic rise in global temperatures, harsher environments, and increased levels of poverty” (Pope Francis, 2018).

Let us safeguard the gains and success we have achieved so far in improving our

Renewable Energy sources and the huge projected excess power supply. We appeal to our Local Government Units and our electric cooperatives all over Negros not to entertain anymore any proposition of a coal-fired power plant in the province and elsewhere.

Let us work together to increase access to clean, renewable, and sustainable energy.

Let us affirm our commitment to stewardship and to a clean development path that says no to coal and yes to renewable energy technologies that are accessible to everyone, especially our most vulnerable brothers and sisters.

Let us heed the call to ecological conversion and to transformative, renewable power that is shared by all.

Let us live Laudato Si’ together with Mary our Mother and our Patron Saints: St. Sebastian, St. Catherine of Alexandria, St. Francis Xavier and St. Charles Borromeo.

We make this collegial declaration in preparation for the Solemnity of Christ the King this 23rd day of November 2018.

Signed by:

+MOST REV. GERARDO A. ALMINAZA, DD
Bishop of San Carlos

+MOST REV. JULITO B. CORTES, DD
Bishop of Dumaguete

+MOST REV. PATRICIO A. BUZON, SDB, DD
Bishop of Bacolod

+MOST REV. LOUIE P. GALBINES, D.D.
Bishop of Kabankalan

Help Indonesian Tsunami Victims

Appeal by Cardinal Charles Maung Bo – Incoming FABC President for Indonesian Tsunami Victims

RESPECTED YOUR EXCELLENCIES, YOUR EMINENCES, RESPECTED ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS AND FRIENDS,

 At the dawn of New Year 2019 we are horrified by the pre-Christmas tsunami tragedy that struck Indonesia. At least 430 people were killed on Saturday 22 December 2018 when the tsunami sparked by under water landslides from an erupting volcano — swept through the Sunda Strait, leaving about 1,500 injured and almost 22,000 displaced in villages on the Java and Sumatra coasts.

This huge tragedy make me recall the pain and suffering when Cyclone Nargis struck Myanmar 10 years ago, some 140,000 lives were lost and 800,000 were displaced.

On the eve of the new year, my thoughts go out to the populations of Indonesia, affected by recent violent natural disasters, which have caused serious losses in human lives, numerous people missing and homeless, and extensive material damage.”

We mourn the numerous deaths and untold suffering the tsunami has left behind at the dawn of the new year 2019.

As a first step, let me invite my brother bishops, pastors and catechists, as well as all religious and lay sisters and brothers to join in praying for the victims and for their loved ones and express our spiritual closeness to those who are affected by the tragedy by imploring God’s consolation in their suffering.

Secondly, in my new year message I join pope Francis to make urgent appeal that these unfortunate brothers and sisters may not lack our solidarity and the support of the International Community.

Thirdly, let us collectively look for ways we could tangibly alleviate the sufferings of our Indonesian brothers and sisters.