Oppostion forces legislators to try and set minimum age of responsibility at 12, not nine
UCAN Joe Torres, Manila Philippines January 24, 2019
Philippine lawmakers have been forced to make a compromise
in their attempt to lower the minimum age of criminal responsibility amid
fierce opposition from child rights advocacy groups and the Catholic Church .
The Lower House of Congress originally proposed to lower the
age to nine years old, but reset the minimum age at 12 as a compromise after
many legislators expressed “reservations.”
Lawmakers approved a bill to set criminal responsibility
starting at 12 years old during its second reading on Jan. 23.
The controversial measure is now only one step away from
being passed in the Lower House.
“That is the [new] consensus,” said Representative
Doy Leachon, chairman of the House Committee on Justice that drafted the bill.
He said panel members on reflection thought “nine years
old was too young.”
Position Statement of the Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas on the proposed House Bill No. 8858
“If anyone causes one
of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large
millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the
sea.” (Matthew 18:6)
The House of Representatives under the Speakership of Gloria
Macapagal Arroyo, is now rushing for the approval of the act amending and
expanding the RA 9344 “The Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006” which will
LOWER DOWN THE MINIMUM AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF CHILDREN FROM 15 YEARS
OLD TO 12 YEARS OLD.
The proposed bill was introduced with the following
objectives:
➢ To protect minors from being exploited by syndicates and unscrupulous persons that use minors to escape liability for crimes and other illegal activities. ➢ To provide adequate intervention and diversion measures for children in conflict with the law. ➢ To increase the penalties for the exploitation of children for the commission of crimes.
Granting that these objectives are reasonable and most ideal
in the current situation, the MAIN ISSUE remains: Will lowering down the age of
criminal responsibility address the causes why children commit crimes?
The Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas firmly believes, together
with other organizations concerned with the welfare of children, that the root
causes are:
1. Poverty and lack of access to opportunities and government services 2. Poor Parenting and Supervision 3. Peer Pressure 4. Prevalence of and unabating criminality resulting to unhealthy social environment
A secondary objection and question which remains to be
answered with certainty is:
“Can the Bahay Pag-asa and the Agricultural Camps and
Training Facility to be established, maintained, supervised and controlled by
DSWD in PARTNERSHIP the BUCOR (Bureau of Corrections) and TESDA, provide and
deliver its mandate “to design and implement the rehabilitation and
intervention programs in these specialized facilities in order to prepare the
residents therein for successful reintegration into their families and
communities upon discharge and release?”
Pending conclusive proof of the viability and success of
these programs in these very expensive “SPECIALIZED FACILITIES”, of which our
government has no model to show, we simply cannot abandon the future of these
“children in conflict with the law” to chance. Each life is invaluable. Bawat
isang buhay at kinabukasan ay mahalaga.
Lastly, a very dangerous section (Section 43-A) was inserted
which in effect will prevent any appeal or reconsideration or correction in the
judgements given to these young offenders, to wit:
SEC 43-A. PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF
RECORDS- ANY PERSON WHO HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF DIVULGING, WILFULLY OR THROUGH
GROSS INEXCUSABLE NEGLIGENCE, THE RECORDS OR ANY INFORMATION RELATION TO THE
PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW, SHALL SUFFER THE
PENALTIES IMPOSED IN TITLE VII, CHAPTER 3 OF THIS ACT.”
Simply put, once a child has been arrested, the court,
within 72 hours, has to make a decision for the petition for an involuntary
commitment to these specialized facilities. The initial period of the placement
of the child shall not be less than one year. After that 72 hours, no person
can have access to the records or any information in relation to the
proceedings. Therefore, No DSWD, NGO or Charitable Institution can help these
children because NO ONE WILL GIVE OUT ANY RECORD OR INFORMATION UNDER THE PAIN
OF STIFF PENALTIES.
We also propose the following to our Legislators:
1. Give priority to the effective implementation of RA 9344. 2. Increase the penalties against the exploiters of children.
With all the foregoing, the SANGGUNIANG LAIKO NG PILIPINAS
calls upon our citizenry to OPPOSE AND MAKE A STAND AGAINST THIS HOUSE BILL
8858.
For the LAIKO Board of Directors,
MA. JULIETA F. WASAN, Ph.D.
President
January 24, 2019
Church leaders from various Christian churches call for
faithful to unite in One Voice at open-air gathering in Rajah Sulayman Park
Different Christian traditions, sects, and denominations
will join in a prophetic chorus to proclaim the God’s calling to choose LIFE
(Deuteronomy 30:15-29), to defend the rights of the poor and needy (Proverbs
31:9), and to declare the favourable year of the Lord for justice and freedom.
“As much as ever, our FAITH is both tested and strengthened,
as we engage mission and ministry to work for truth, justice and peace in our
NATION, which continues to face a crisis of truth, intensive poverty,
violations of human rights and widespread killings,” said Bishop Broderick
Pabillo, DD of the CBCP Episcopal Commission on the Laity
“The Christian imperative to defend human dignity and
promote the respect of God-given LIFE unites us in ONE VOICE so that our people
will know God’s intention for justice to roll down like a never-ending stream
(Amos 5:24), so that peace may be known throughout the land,” said Ms. Minnie
Ann Calub of the Ntional Council of Churches in the Philippines.
“As we work for Christian unity in the Philippines, we
summon the Christian faithful to bring their prayers and concerns to a public
gathering. We seek to focus on the truth that will unite us and our common hope
the Christ’s peace may prevail in our communities and nation,” said Bishop
Ciriaco Francisco of the United Methodist Church.
As our fellow Filipinos in the Autonomous Region for Muslim
Mindanao (ARMM) region go through the Bangsamoro Organic Law Plebiscite, the
National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL) encourages all
eligible voters in the region, to exercise their right to vote. This is a
defining moment in our country, as the outcome of the Plebiscite will determine
the fate of the region and the country as well. We believe that this democratic
process must be nothing less than an enabling mechanism for the people in the
region to bring a more peaceful and prosperous change.
In support of this
democratic process, NAMFREL, together with its provincial chapter chairpersons
and hundreds of volunteers will monitor and observe the preparation and conduct
of the Bangsamoro Plebiscite.
NAMFREL calls on all
authorities; the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and its deputized agencies
the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the Philippine National Police (PNP)
and other stakeholders; to continue to ensure that the Plebiscite can take
place in a secure and fair environment.
We express our deep concern at recent reports that in some ARMM areas
the use of electoral fraud, force, threats and intimidation is being employed
to curtail the voters right to vote or influence it. We condemn these nefarious
acts.
NAMFREL extends its
support to the COMELEC in their role to deliver a plebiscite that truly
reflects the will of the people and ensure its credibility. We stand by the
people in the Bangsamoro areas, as they vote and decide on their future. The people in the ARMM deserve a free, fair,
and peaceful plebiscite. We hope that
the result of the Plebiscite would be a step towards self-determination so
lasting peace, development and prosperity will reign in the region.
‘Nakita natin as young as 10 years old, these are being used as drug runners,’ says Philippine National Police chief Oscar Albayalde
Rambo Talabong Published 8:38 PM, January 21, 2019 Updated 9:36 PM, January 21, 2019
MANILA, Philippines – Figures from the Philippine National
Police (PNP) released on Monday, January 21, showed that from January 2017 to
December 2018, the police have caught over 1,300 children aged 17 years and
below for their alleged involvement in illegal drugs.
In 2017, police captured – or “rescued,” as law
enforcers prefer to say – and turned over to rehabilitation agencies 481 minors
who allegedly violated the Dangerous Drugs Act or Republic Act No. 9165 (RA
9165). Police caught almost double that figure or 857 minors in 2018.
This means that in a span of two years, a total of 1,338
minors were caught for their alleged involvement in illegal drugs. This is
equivalent to around 13 apprehensions of minors a week.
RA 9165 penalizes acts such as using, carrying, selling,
manufacturing, and importing illegal drugs, as well as managing a drug
laboratory or farm.
Republic Act No. 9344 or the Juvenile Justice Law of 2006
sets the minimum age of criminal liability at 15 years old – meaning those
between 15 to 18 years old may be detained in youth centers and be put through
rehabilitation programs. Those under 15 years old are exempted from criminal
liability and undergo intervention.
Minors being ‘used’: During his press briefing on Monday,
PNP chief Director General Oscar Albayalde noted that most of the minors who
commit violations of RA 9165 are just being “used” by adults.
“Nakita natin as young as 10 years old, these are being used as drug runners. Ito ang pinaka-runners. Natututo din ang matatanda kasi alam nila itong mga bata ay ‘di makukulong,” Albayalde said. (We saw children as young as 10 years old being used as drug runners. They are the runners themselves. The adults have learned to use them because children cannot be jailed.)
Albayalde said this is why the police are
“inclined” to support a law lowering the age of criminal liability.
On Monday, the House committee on justice approved a bill that seeks to lower
the minimum age of criminal responsibility from 15 years old to 9 years old.
As early as October 2018, the PNP already expressed its
support for similar proposals made in the Senate. – with a report from Camille
Elemia/Rappler.com
The Philippine Apostolic Congress on Mercy (PACOM) will be
held at the FILOIL FLYING V Center “San Juan Arena” from January 24-26, 2019.
PACOM is part of the worldwide congresses that promote the
devotion to the Divine Mercy. It emanates from the World Apostolic Congress on
Mercy (WACOM), and from it comes the Asian Apostolic Congress on Mercy (AACOM).
The theme for this year’s celebration is Divine Mercy, in
Communion with the Young.
For inquiries please call (02) 6976132 or 09052038531 or
email at pacom2019.sec@gmail.com.
PROGRAM DETAILS
DAY ONE – 24TH JANUARY 2019 7:00 AM 9:00 AM REGISTRATION 9:00 AM 10:00 AM OPENING CEREMONIES 10:00 AM 10:15 AM BREAK 10:15 AM 12:15 PM OPENING MASS TALK 1 – “DIVINE MERCY FOR YOU(TH)” 12:15 PM 1:15 PM LUNCH 1:15 PM 1:30 PM INTERMISSION AFTERNOON WORSHIP (YOUTH FOR CHRIST) 1:30 PM 2:45 PM TALK 2 – “IMG (I AM GOD)” (Selfie Syndrome and the Image of Mercy) 2:45 PM 3:30 PM HOUR OF MERCY BENEDICTION 3:30 PM 3:45 PM BREAK 3:45 PM 5:00 PM TALK 2 OPEN FORUM Q&A CLOSING
DAY TWO– 25TH JANUARY 2019 TIME START TIME END TOPIC ACTIVITIES 7:30 AM 8:00 AM ASSEMBLY 8:00 AM 9:00 AM HOLY MASS 9:00 AM 10:00 AM TALK 3 – “N-CHANCES: From No to Nfinity” (Healing Broken Relationships Through the Divine Mercy) 10:00 AM 10:30 AM TALK 3 OPEN FORUM Q&A 10:30 AM 10:45 AM BREAK 10:45 AM 11:45 AM TALK 4 – “IMMORTAL COMBAT” (Divine Mercy and the Battle for Souls) 11:45 AM 12:15 PM TALK 4 OPEN FORUM Q&A 12:15 PM 1:15 PM LUNCH
INTERMISSION 1:15 PM 1:30 PM AFTERNOON WORSHIP 1:30 PM 2:30 PM TALK 5 – “HEART RESPONSE/ LDR (LOVE DESPITE REGRET)” (Love and Responsibility, The Divine Mercy Way) 2:30 PM 3:30 PM HOUR OF MERCY (TESTIMONIALS) 3:30 PM 3:45 PM BREAK 3:45 PM 5:00 PM TALK 5 OPEN FORUM Q&A
DAY THREE – 26TH JANUARY 2019 TIME START TIME END TOPIC ACTIVITIES 7:30 AM 8:00 AM ASSEMBLY OPENING WORSHIP 8:00 AM 9:30 AM TALK 6 – “AWA’T KALINGA” : PANEL DISCUSSION on ADDICTION, DEPRESSION AND JUVENILE DELIQUENCY 9:30 AM 9:45 AM BREAK 9:45 AM 12:15 PM TALK 7 – L.O.L. : LIVING OUT LOUD! (PART 2) – Spiritual Works of Mercy 12:15 PM 1:15 PM LUNCH 1:15 PM 2:30 PM GROUP DISCUSSIONS 2:30 PM 3:30 PM HOUR OF MERCY 3:30 PM 5:00 PM CLOSING MASS COMMISSIONING TALK 8 – “Y2G (YES TO GOD)/ BTW (BACK TO WORK)” (SPREADING THE DIVINE MERCY TO THE YOUTH OF TODAY)
Three Wednesdays from now, or on February 6, 2019 from 1-4pm
at the UCCP Cosmopolitan Church, our Ambassador to China, His Excellency Chito
Sta. Romana has very kindly accepted our invitation to speak before the
Wednesday Forum in its inaugural session for 2019. We wanted our kind
Ambassador to help us better discern our relations with China in light of a
number of issues primarily that of Chinese loans to our country which are
reportedly on commercial rates of interest. Being a well-known nationalist and
an advocate of peoples’ democratic interests, Ambassador Chito might also be
able to say something about the West Philippine Sea Issue and even on the drug
shipments reportedly coming from China.
A biblico-theological reflection to be given by the Rev. Dr.
Mar Apilado, Chaplain of the Church of the Risen Lord in UP Diliman will
precede the Ambassador’s presentation. A panel of reactors/inquirers to be led
by Dr. Ted Mendoza of UP Los Banos and Dr. Roland Simbulan from UP Manila will
help direct the open forum that follows.
Please feel free to reproduce this letter and invite friends
and colleagues. The venue is big enough to accommodate any number of
participants many of whom, hopefully, would be students from UP Manila and
nearby universities and colleges. Admission is free and is open to all seekers
of truth, of justice and of an enduring peace in our land.
For your advance information, our future Wednesday Forum
speakers for February 20, 2019 is Mr. Sonny Africa of Ibon Foundation on the
State of our Economy and for March 20, 2019 Mr. Mon Casiple of the Institute
for Political and Electoral Reforms on Crucial Issues in the May Elections.
Please call or write me for more inquiries. It would be
ideal if you can confirm your participation to ensure that we can properly
acknowledge your presence. My number is 0999-880-3794. Email is
alsenturias@gmail.com.Thank you so much.
Church rehab program offers hope, vocational training to ‘lost’ minority living in fear of President Duterte’s war on drugs
UCANews | Bong Sarmiento, Tacurong City, Philippines January 16, 2019
Jonathan Padrones has been hooked on illegal narcotics for
years but is trying to “redeem” himself with the help of his parish
church, he says.
Padrones, 44, said he first tried hydrochloride, a
methamphetamine commonly known by its street name “shabu” in the
Philippines, out of curiosity when he was in his 20s.
“I ended up getting hooked,” he said, adding this
soon made him “public enemy number one” in his community.
Padrones said he would spend up to US$20 a day buying shabu.
Eventually, he began peddling illegal drugs to sustain his addiction.
When President Rodrigo Duterte launched his “war
against drugs” in 2016, Padrones was placed on a police watch-list.
Instead of mending his ways, he went into hiding. This
changed when he heard of a Catholic Church-run program for drug addicts called
“Help Care for Change, Hope and Learning.”
Father Salvador Robles, the parish priest of Tacurong City
in the southern Philippines, said that when Duterte launched his campaign
against narcotics, at least 100 people availed themselves of the program.
The government’s war on drugs has claimed over 20,000 lives,
according to human rights groups. In August 2017, Duterte vowed to press on
with the campaign even though soldiers have described it as “an unwinnable
war.”
‘Promote and protect human life at every stage of its
development, its condemnation of abortion and euthanasia as extremely grave
evils that contradict the Spirit of life and plunge us into the anti-culture of
death’
JANUARY 15, 2019 11:18ZENIT STAFFPAPAL TEXTS
Pope Francis has sent a letter to the Pontifical Academy for
Life to mark its 25th Anniversary, as it was founded 11 February 1994. Here is
the Vatican-provided text of Pope Francis’ letter, which was signed, Jan. 6,
2019, and published today:
Humana Communitas [The Human Community]
The human community is God’s dream even from before the
creation of the world (cf. Eph 1:3-14). In it, the eternal Son begotten of God
the Father has taken flesh and blood, heart and emotions. Through the mystery
of giving life, the great family of humanity is enabled to discover its true
meaning. The ability of the family to initiate its members to human fraternity
can be considered a hidden treasure that can aid that general rethinking of
social policies and human rights whose need is so urgently felt today. All of
us ought to grow in the awareness of our common origin in God’s love and
creative act. Christian faith confesses the begetting of the Son as the
ineffable mystery of the eternal unity between “bringing into being” and
“benevolent love” within the life of the Triune God. A renewed proclamation of
this often overlooked revelation can open a new chapter in the history of human
community and culture, which today cries out — “groaning as if in labour pains”
(cf. Rom 8:22) — for rebirth in the Spirit. God’s tenderness and his will to
redeem all those who feel lost, abandoned, discarded, or hopelessly condemned,
is revealed in the only-begotten Son. The mystery of the eternal Son who became
one of us is the definitive witness to this “passion” of God. The mystery of
Christ’s cross — “for us and for our salvation” — and resurrection — as “the
firstborn of many brothers” (Rom 8:29) — tells us the extent to which God’s
passion is directed to the redemption and full flourishing of human beings.
We need to renew a lively awareness of God’s passion for
humanity and its world. Human beings were made by God “in his image” – “male and
female” (Gen 1:27) – as spiritual and sentient, conscious and free. The
relationship between man and woman is the primary place where all creation
speaks with God and bears witness to his love. This world is the place where we
are brought to life; it is the place and time in which we gain a foretaste of
the heavenly home that is our destiny (cf. 2 Cor 5:1) and where we will live
fully our communion with God and with all others. The human family is a
community with a common origin and a common goal, whose attainment “is hidden,
with Christ, in God” (Col 3:1-4). In our time, the Church is called once more
to propose the humanism of the life that bursts forth from God’s passion for
human beings. Our commitment to valuing, supporting and defending the life of every
human being is ultimately motivated by God’s unconditional love. Such is the
beauty and the allure of the Gospel, which does not reduce love of neighbour to
criteria of economic or political convenience, or to “certain doctrinal or
moral points based on specific ideological options” (Evangelii Gaudium, 39).
A passionate and productive history
1. That passion has inspired the work of the Pontifical
Academy for Life from the time it was created twenty-five years ago by Saint
John Paul II at the prompting of the eminent scientist and Servant of God
Jérôme Lejeune. Recognizing the rapid and sweeping changes taking place in
biomedicine, Pope John Paul saw the need for a more structured and organic
approach and engagement in this area. The Academy was thus able to promote
initiatives of research, education and communications aimed at demonstrating
“that science and technology, at the service of the human person and his
fundamental rights, contribute to the overall good of man and to the fulfilment
of the divine plan of salvation.” (SAINT JOHN PAUL II, Motu Proprio Vitae
Mysterium [11 February 1994], 3). The new statutes of the Academy, issued on 18
October 2016, have given renewed impetus to its activities. The goal of the
statutes is to make the Academy’s reflection on human life issues ever more
attuned to the contemporary scene. The ever-quickening pace of technological
and scientific innovation, and the phenomenon of globalization have multiplied
interactions between cultures, religions and different fields of study, and
among the many dimensions of our human family and the earth, our common home.
“There is an urgent need for greater study and discussion of the social effects
of this technological development, for the sake of articulating an anthropological
vision adequate to this epochal challenge. Yet your expert advice cannot be
limited solely to offering solutions to the questions raised by specific
ethical, social or legal conflict situations. The proposal of forms of conduct
consistent with human dignity involves the theory and practice of science and
technology in terms of their overall approach to life, its meaning and its
value” (5 October 2017).
Loss of the human dimension and the paradox of “progress”
2. At this moment in time, passion for what is distinctively
human, and for the whole human family, encounters serious obstacles. The joys
of family relationships and social coexistence appear seriously diminished.
Mutual distrust between individuals and peoples is being fed by an inordinate
pursuit of self-interest and intense competition that can even turn violent.
The gap between concern with one’s own well-being and the prosperity of the
larger human family seems to be stretching to the point of complete division.
In the Encyclical Laudato Sì, I pointed to the state of emergency existing in
our relationship with the history of the earth and its peoples. This alarming
situation is the result of the scarce attention paid to the decisive global
issue of the unity of the human family and its future. The erosion of this
sensitivity, due to worldly forces of conflict and war, is growing worldwide at
a much higher rate than that of the production of goods. We are speaking of a
real culture – indeed, it would be better to speak of anti-culture – of indifference
to the community: hostile to men and women and in league with the arrogance of
wealth.
3. This emergency reveals a paradox. How could it happen
that, at the very moment of history when available economic and technological
resources make it possible for us to care suitably for our common home and our
human family, in obedience to God’s command, those same economic and
technological resources are creating our most bitter divisions and our worst
nightmares? People sense acutely and painfully, albeit often confusedly, the
spiritual dejection, or even nihilism, that subordinates life itself to a world
and a society dominated by this paradox. The attempt to dull this sense of deep
distress by the blind pursuit of material pleasure produces the ennui of a life
lacking in a purpose that can satisfy its spiritual yearning. Let us face the
fact: men and women in our time are often demoralized and disoriented, bereft
of vision. All of us are, to some extent, closed in on ourselves. The financial
system and the ideology of consumerism regulate our needs and manipulate our
desires, with little concern for beauty of a life in common and for the sustainability
of our common home.
4. Christians, hearing the cry of suffering peoples, need to
react against the negativity that foments division, indifference and hostility.
They must do so not simply for their own sake, but for that of everyone. And
they need to do so now, before it is too late. The ecclesial family of
disciples – and of all others who seek in that family reasons for hope (cf. 1
Pet 3:15) – has been planted on earth as “a sacrament, a sign and instrument a
communion with God and of the unity of the entire human race” (Lumen Gentium,
1). The restoration of each of God’s creatures to the joyful hope of his or her
spiritual destiny must become the passionate theme of our preaching. It is
urgent that the elderly have greater confidence in their best “dreams” and that
the young have “visions” able to sustain them to act boldly in history (cf. Jl
3:1). At the level of culture, our goal must be a new and universal ethical
perspective attentive to the themes of creation and human life. We cannot
continue down the mistaken path followed in recent decades of allowing humanism
to be deconstructed and considered simply as another ideology of the will to
power. We must resist such ideologies, however strongly urged by the market and
by technology, and choose humanism. The distinctiveness of human life is an
absolute good, worthy of being ethically defended, precious for the care of
creation as a whole. For humanism not to draw inspiration from the loving act
of God would be a contradiction and a scandal. The Church must be the first to
rediscover the beauty of this inspiration and make her contribution with
renewed enthusiasm.
A difficult task for the Church
5. We acknowledge the difficulties involved in restoring
this broader humanistic horizon, even within the Church. First, we can ask
frankly if our ecclesial communities today realize and testify to the gravity
of this contemporary emergency. Are they seriously focused on the passion and
joy of proclaiming God’s love for the dwelling of his children on the earth? Or
are they still overly focused on their own problems and on making timid
accommodations to an essentially worldly outlook? We can question seriously
whether we have done enough as Christians to offer our specific contribution to
a vision of humanity capable of upholding the unity of the family of peoples in
today’s political and cultural conditions. Or whether we have lost sight of its
centrality, putting our ambition for spiritual hegemony over the governance of
the secular city, concentrated as it is upon itself and its wealth, ahead of a
concern for local communities inspired by the Gospel spirit of hospitality towards
the poor and the hopeless.
Building universal fraternity
6. It is time for a new vision aimed at promoting a humanism
of fraternity and solidarity between individuals and peoples. We know that the
faith and love needed for this covenant draw their power from the mystery of
history’s redemption in Jesus Christ, a mystery hidden in God even before the
creation of the world (cf. Eph 1:7-10; 3:9-11; Col 1:13-14). We know too that
human minds and hearts are not completely closed or insensible to the seeds of
faith and the works of this universal fraternity sown by the Gospel of the
kingdom of God. We must once again bring this fraternity to the fore. For it is
one thing to feel forced to live together, but something entirely different to
value the richness and beauty of the seeds of common life needing to be sought
out and cultivated. It is one thing to resign oneself to seeing life as a
battle against constant foes, but something entirely different to see our human
family as a sign of the abundant life of God the Father and the promise of a
common destiny redeemed by the infinite love that even now sustains it in
being.
7. The ways of the Church all lead to man, as Saint John
Paul II solemnly proclaimed in his first encyclical (Redemptor Hominis, 1979).
Before him, Saint Paul VI, echoing the teaching of the Council, had stated in
his own first encyclical that the Church family extends in concentric circles
to all men and women, even to those who consider themselves extraneous to the
faith and the worship of God (cf. Ecclesiam Suam, 1964). The Church shelters
and protects the signs of grace and mercy that God offers to every human being
who comes into this world.
Recognizing the signs of hope
8. In this mission, we are encouraged by signs that God is
at work in our time. These signs need to be acknowledged and not overshadowed
by certain negative factors. Along these lines, Saint John Paul II pointed to
the many efforts to welcome and defend human life, the growing opposition to
war and to the death penalty, and a greater concern for the quality of life and
ecology. He also indicated as a sign of hope the development of bioethics as
“reflection and dialogue – between believers and nonbelievers, as well as
between believers of different religions – on ethical problems, even the most
fundamental ones, that affect the life of man” (Evangelium Vitae, 27). The
scientific community of the Pontifical Academy for Life has demonstrated, over
the past twenty-five years, its ability to enter into this dialogue and to
offer its own competent and respected contribution. A sign of this is its
constant effort to promote and protect human life at every stage of its
development, its condemnation of abortion and euthanasia as extremely grave
evils that contradict the Spirit of life and plunge us into the anti-culture of
death. These efforts must certainly continue, with an eye to emerging issues
and challenges that can serve as an opportunity for us to grow in the faith, to
understand it more deeply and to communicate it more effectively to the people
of our time.
The future of the Academy
9. Before all else, we need to enter into the language and
lives of men and women today, making the Gospel message incarnate in their
concrete experiences, as the Council demanded. To appreciate the meaning of
human life, we should begin with the experience of procreation; this will
enable us to avoid reducing life merely to a biological concept or a universal
abstraction divorced from relationships and from history. The primordial
reality of our “flesh” precedes and makes possible all further consciousness
and reflection, preventing us from thinking that we are the source of our own
existence. Only after receiving the gift of life, and prior to any intention or
decision of our own, can we become aware that we are in fact alive. Life
necessarily entails being a child, welcomed and cared for, however inadequately
in certain cases. “It thus seems reasonable to see a connection between the
care we have received from the beginning of life, that enabled it to grow and
develop, and the responsible care we in turn give to others… This precious
connection preserves a human and God-given dignity that endures, even despite
one’s loss of health, role in society and control over his or her body” (Letter
of the Cardinal Secretary of State to the Conference on Palliative Care, 28
February 2018).
10. We know that the threshold of basic respect for human
life is being crossed, and brutally at that, not only by instances of
individual conduct but also by the effects of societal choices and structures.
Business strategies and the pace of technological growth now, as never before,
condition biomedical research, educational priorities, investment decisions and
the quality of interpersonal relationships. The possibility of directing
economic development and scientific progress towards the covenant between man
and woman, towards caring for our common humanity and towards the dignity of
the human person, surely arises from a love for creation that faith helps us to
deepen and illuminate. The prospect of a global bioethics, with a broad vision
and a concern for the impact of the environment on life and health, offers a
significant opportunity for strengthening the new covenant between the Gospel
and creation.
11. Our shared humanity demands a global approach to the
questions raised by the dialogue between diverse cultures and societies that,
in today’s world, are in increasingly close contact. May the Academy for Life
be a place for courageous dialogue in the service of the common good. I
encourage you not to be afraid to advance arguments and formulations that can
serve as a basis for intercultural and interreligious, as well as
interdisciplinary, exchanges. But also to take part in the discussion of human
rights, which are central to the search for universally acceptable criteria for
decisions. At stake is the understanding and exercise of a justice that
demonstrates the essential role of responsibility in the discussion of human
rights and about their close correlation with duties, beginning with solidarity
with those in greatest need. Pope Benedict XVI has spoken of the importance of
“a renewed reflection on howrights presuppose duties, if they are not to become
mere licence. Nowadays we are witnessing a grave inconsistency. On the one
hand, appeals are made to alleged rights, arbitrary and non-essential in
nature, accompanied by the demand that they be recognized and promoted by
public structures, while, on the other hand, elementary and basic rights remain
unacknowledged and are violated in much of the world”. Among those rights, the
Pope emeritus points to “lack of food, drinkable water, basic instruction and
elementary health care” (Caritas in Veritate, 43).
12. Another area calling for study is that of the new
technologies described as “emergent” and “convergent.” These include
information and communication technologies, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies
and robotics. Relying on results obtained from physics, genetics and
neuroscience, as well as on increasingly powerful computing capabilities, profound
interventions on living organisms are now possible. Even the human body is
subject to interventions capable of modifying not only its functions and
capabilities, but also its ways of relating on personal and societal levels,
with the result that it is increasingly exposed to market forces. There is a
pressing need, then, to understand these epochal changes and new frontiers in
order to determine how to place them at the service of the human person, while
respecting and promoting the intrinsic dignity of all. This task is extremely
demanding, given its complexity and the unpredictability of future
developments; consequently, it requires even greater discernment than usual. We
can define this discernment as “a sincere work of conscience, in its effort to know
the possible good on the basis of which to engage responsibly in the correct
exercise of practical reason” (SYNOD OF BISHOPS ON YOUNG PEOPLE, Final Document
[27 October 2018], 109). This process of research and evaluation thus entails
the workings of the moral conscience and, for the believer, is part of his or
her relationship with the Lord Jesus, in the desire to put on the mind of
Christ in our actions and choices (cf. Phil 2:5).
13. The kind of medicine, economy, technology and politics
that develop within the modern city of man must also, and above all, remain
subject to the judgment rendered by the peripheries of the earth. Indeed, the
many extraordinary resources made available to human beings by scientific and
technological research could overshadow the joy of fraternal sharing and the
beauty of common undertakings, unless they find their meaning in advancing that
joy and beauty. We should keep in mind that fraternity remains the unkept
promise of modernity. The universal spirit of fraternity that grows by mutual
trust – within modern civil society and between peoples and nations – appears
much weakened. The strengthening of fraternity, generated in the human family
by the worship of God in spirit and truth, is the new frontier of Christianity.
Every detail of the life of the body and of the soul, in which the love and
redemptive power of the new creation shine forth within us, leads to amazement
before the miracle of a resurrection in the very process of occurring (cf. Col
3:1-2). May the Lord grant that we multiply these miracles! May the witness of
Saint Francis of Assisi, who saw himself as the brother of every creature on
earth and in heaven, inspire us by its perennial relevance. May the Lord
prepare you for this new phase of your mission, your lamps filled with the oil
of the Spirit to light your path and to guide your steps. How beautiful indeed
are the feet of those who bring the joyful proclamation of God’s love for the
life of all those who dwell upon our land (cf. Is 52: 7; Rom 10:15).